The recent naming contest for Chicago’s snow plows has turned into a fierce debate, highlighting the city’s ongoing struggles with immigration and safety. At the center of the controversy is Mayor Brandon Johnson’s endorsement of “Abolish ICE” as a potential name for one of the plows. Mayor Johnson, a strong advocate for progressive policies, made this announcement during an MSNBC appearance with Rev. Al Sharpton. He encouraged Chicago residents to share their suggestions before the January 10, 2026, deadline, stating, “Abolish ICE has my full endorsement.”
This bold move by Johnson has drawn the attention of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commander Greg Bovino. On social media, Bovino issued a sharp message to the mayor, warning that efforts to keep Chicago safe would continue despite such disruptive endorsements. “If you think we’re done with Chicago, you’d better check yourself before you wreck yourself,” he asserted, implying that the city’s law enforcement will remain committed to their duties and will not be easily deterred.
Bovino offered a counter-suggestion to the naming contest, introducing the idea of “Reality Check” as a more fitting name for the snow plow. He humorously remarked, “Name the plow ‘Reality Check’ and paint it green while you’re at it. Johnson obsesses over Border Patrol, it seems!” This comment sets a confrontational tone, poking fun at the mayor’s position and raising questions about his handling of public safety.
An equally heated response came from former Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, who lashed out at Bovino for his comments. She termed him a “glory hound” and criticized the actions of CBP personnel under his command as “unconstitutional and shameful.” Lightfoot warned Bovino of a looming “day of reckoning,” framing the incident as a clash between local authority and federal enforcement.
Lightfoot’s remarks did not sit well with the public or the media, as many scrutinized her record during her tenure. Chicago reporter William Kelly responded directly to her comments, reminding her of the “bizarre antics” that led to her defeat in the most recent election. His retort, “That’s why they didn’t vote to re-elect you,” resonated with many who viewed her leadership as inconsistent.
P. Rae Easley, who is not just a community advocate but also a congressional candidate, joined the fray with a passionate defense. Easley highlighted the community issues related to violence, referencing a violent incident in which a friend was shot. By stating, “If [Lightfoot] didn’t give the sanctuary ordinance teeth, WE wouldn’t have had to beg the President to send [Bovino] here to clean up our communities,” she underscored the urgency of the situation and the local frustrations with the existing policies.
This contentious back-and-forth showcases the layers of complexity within Chicago’s current political climate. While Mayor Johnson’s “Abolish ICE” proposal attempts to draw attention to immigration reforms, it also exposes a city grappling with rising crime and safety concerns. Meanwhile, Commander Bovino and his rhetoric suggest a robust framework for federal involvement in local issues, further complicating the relationship between Chicago’s political leaders and federal law enforcement.
As the snow plow naming deadline draws near, it remains to be seen how this debate will evolve. Will it serve as a mere distraction, or will it force meaningful conversations about safety, immigration, and local governance in one of America’s largest cities? The realities on the ground might demand more than just clever rhetoric or provocative names.
"*" indicates required fields
