On June 18, 2024, during a Senate session, Elon Musk highlighted a significant example of government inefficiency regarding military funding. Speaking directly to the issues of accountability and transparency, Musk shared a troubling account involving Senator Susan Collins and the $12 billion allocated to the U.S. Navy for new submarines. Musk quoted Collins, who, after securing the funds, uncovered that no additional submarines were built with that money: “Got no extra submarines. Held a hearing to say, ‘Where’d the $12 billion go?’ They were like, ‘We don’t know.’ That was it!”
This revelation exposes serious concerns about how taxpayer dollars are utilized within the military. If Musk’s account holds, the Navy received funding equal to 20% of its annual shipbuilding budget without delivering a single vessel. The staggering sum should have produced at least three Virginia-class attack submarines, valued at over $3.5 billion each, yet no tangible results materialized.
The Defense Procurement Crisis
The implications of Musk’s statement are profound. It underscores the persistent issues plaguing the Pentagon’s procurement process, where substantial allocations can result in zero outcomes. A glaring transparency gap looms, as the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General has yet to provide information regarding the vanished funds.
The broader context reveals ongoing tensions in Senate discussions concerning military funding and oversight. Collins, a senior member of the Appropriations Committee, has repeatedly defended robust naval investments, viewing them as essential for national security amid increasing threats in the Indo-Pacific. This year, she has been at the forefront of advocating substantial investments to address production backlogs.
However, Musk’s commentary signifies the frustrating mismatch between legislative funding efforts and actual military readiness. A 2022 report from the Government Accountability Office indicated significant delays and cost overruns in the Navy’s shipbuilding programs, with averages stretching over two years. The disconnect between funding and production raises critical questions about the Pentagon’s ability to effectively manage its resources.
Systemic Challenges in Submarine Production
Experts point to various factors contributing to the Navy’s production slowdowns. Industrial limitations, subcontractor shortages, and a lack of skilled labor—exacerbated by post-pandemic challenges—have hindered progress. The two main suppliers, General Dynamics Electric Boat and Huntington Ingalls Industries, admit they are not meeting delivery schedules on the Virginia-class program due to these constraints.
Highlighting this issue, Navy officials reported that only one Virginia-class submarine is being produced annually instead of the two required. This stagnation threatens critical projects, including the Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine designed to replace aging assets. The tangled web of procurement processes obstructs fulfillment of commitments, leaving vast sums potentially wasted or redirected into non-essential costs.
Impacts on National Security
The stakes extend beyond mismanaged budgets. Submarines are vital for America’s global deterrence, and falling short in production jeopardizes military readiness and signals weakness to adversaries. The Navy’s current fleet of 49 submarines is projected to decline to 46 by 2028 due to retirements outpacing new constructions, while China’s submarine fleet grows increasingly formidable.
Collins has previously urged the Defense Department to enhance transparency regarding submarine production and to ensure appropriated funds are effectively utilized rather than squandered. Yet, Musk’s anecdote has galvanized a renewed call for accountability and scrutiny of Defense Department processes.
Demand for Reform
This moment could signify a turning point for oversight of military appropriations. Legislation is being proposed to tighten accounting rules within the Defense Department, establish progress reporting for major programs, and impose penalties for failures to meet timelines or budgets. Senator Chuck Grassley has introduced a bill focused on ensuring transparency for unspent military appropriations, demonstrating bipartisan momentum toward reform.
The call for reform comes at a critical juncture. The average taxpayer is left questioning the value of their dollars: with $12 billion earmarked, the return remains zero submarines. Musk encapsulated the sentiment succinctly with his closing comment: “That was it!” His words resonate as a call for accountability amid a system that has consistently failed to deliver on its promises.
"*" indicates required fields
