Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) has taken a strong stance on welfare spending, particularly as it pertains to immigrants. In an appearance on Newsmax’s “Rob Schmitt Tonight,” Fine argued that the United States should end all federal spending on welfare for both illegal aliens and legal immigrants. He highlighted the nation’s growing debt, stating, “We’re borrowing a trillion dollars a year that we don’t have, and we shouldn’t be giving that money to foreigners.” This sentiment reflects a growing concern among many Americans about fiscal responsibility.
Fine’s advocacy against welfare for immigrants is not new; he has consistently raised alarms about welfare programs that benefit those in the country without contributing to its economy. His harsh rhetoric isn’t just limited to illegal immigration. He also critiques certain legal immigrants, suggesting they, too, are a financial burden. “These aren’t the legal immigrants of 100 years ago who came to America for freedom and opportunity,” he stated, pointing to current practices that he believes encourage dependence on government aid.
One example Fine cited was the Somali migrants in Minnesota, whom he described as individuals looking for “how much free stuff they can get, whether it’s legal or scam.” This assertion supports a broader narrative pushed by some lawmakers, claiming that modern immigration lacks the same meritocratic values as the past. For Fine, the core issue is not just illegal immigration; it encompasses a broader critique of how immigration policy has evolved over time.
As he concluded his remarks, Fine reinforced his call for stopping welfare disbursements to foreign nationals. “I think we need to cut off all welfare for all immigrants. Americans only… no more borrowing from our kids to give free stuff to foreigners,” he said. These comments resonate with his audience, which is increasingly concerned about government spending and the welfare state’s expansion.
His post on X (formerly Twitter) drew significant engagement, with many commenters expressing support for his position. Statements like “Even citizens need meaningful PAID work requirements of 40 hours per week” and “No immigrant should be allowed if that immigrant requires public support. How is that fair to already strained taxpayers?” highlight a shared belief that taxpayer money should prioritize those who have contributed to the economy.
The overall atmosphere surrounding this issue suggests that Fine’s message is striking a chord with constituents wary of what they perceive as an unmanageable welfare system. Other posts echoed similar sentiments, urging not merely a cutback on immigrant welfare but calling for the abolition of the programs altogether. “Stop the programs… solve the deficit spending… and fix the country’s real issues,” one commenter said, emphasizing a desire for government to refocus its efforts.
In summary, Rep. Fine’s remarks reflect a growing frustration with federal spending habits that many believe do not serve the American people well. The criticisms of both illegal and legal immigration from him serve not only as a political stance but also imply that America needs to reassess its approach to welfare, especially as it faces ongoing financial challenges. The prevailing opinion among his supporters is clear: it’s time to prioritize American citizens in government assistance and discontinue welfare schemes they argue are unsustainable and ineffective.
"*" indicates required fields
