President Donald Trump sent a blunt warning to Colombian President Gustavo Petro on Saturday, highlighting Colombia’s ongoing drug production amid tensions over U.S. military actions against Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro. During a news conference addressing the details of a recent raid that targeted Maduro, Trump was questioned about whether Petro should feel unsettled. His reply was direct: “Well, he has cocaine mills. He has factories where he makes cocaine, and yeah, I think I stick by my first statement. He’s making cocaine. They’re sending it into the United States.”
Trump’s comments underscore a larger issue concerning Colombia’s relationship with drug trafficking. The former president stated unequivocally that Petro “has to watch his ass,” suggesting that Colombia plays a pivotal role in the drug trade affecting the U.S. This warning came after Petro publicly condemned the U.S. for its military operations against what he described as fishermen—an assertion that highlights a significant disconnect between the two leaders.
Petro’s earlier remarks on social media criticized U.S. attacks, framing them as assaults on innocent individuals. In stark contrast, Trump characterized the Colombian leader as a “drug leader,” claiming Petro is complicit in promoting drug production throughout the country. He went so far as to declare that payments and subsidies from the U.S. to Colombia could no longer continue, cutting off financial support due to what he viewed as Colombia’s failure to tackle the drug issue head-on.
In a detailed post, Trump emphasized that the drug trade has become “the biggest business in Colombia, by far.” He further accused Petro of neglecting to combat this epidemic despite receiving substantial financial aid from the United States. Trump stated, “They make cocaine in Colombia. He’s a very bad guy,” shedding light on the U.S. perspective that views these drug operations not only as a legal failing but as a contributing factor to the social chaos caused by drug abuse in America.
Moreover, Trump warned Petro, calling on him to “close up these killing fields immediately, or the United States will close them up for him, and it won’t be done nicely.” His choice of words conveys a sense of urgency about the continuing drug crisis and positions the U.S. as willing to take drastic steps if Colombia does not act.
The situation escalates further as Secretary of State Marco Rubio drew parallels with Cuba during the same news conference. He expressed concerns that the Cuban government might reconsider its position after the U.S. military operations in Venezuela, indicating a broader regional implication of this conflict. Rubio’s remarks and Trump’s pointed comments reveal a consistent theme of U.S. officials addressing drug issues, suggesting potential repercussions should these nations continue their current paths.
In response to the raid, Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel condemned the U.S. actions, labeling them as “state terrorism.” His remarks signal a growing discord in the region, highlighting how the fallout from U.S. military engagement in Venezuela could ripple through neighboring countries.
This dynamic illustrates the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America, especially concerning drug trafficking and military intervention. The focus on Petro and Colombia emerges from a long history of U.S. attempts to combat the drug trade in the region. The tension between these leaders reveals not only differing perspectives on the drug issue itself but also broader geopolitical challenges in Latin America.
Trump’s direct language and Petro’s defensiveness paint a picture of escalating tensions between Colombia and the United States, centered around drug production. The implications of this exchange resonate beyond the two countries, reflecting the intricate web of relationships and conflicts that define U.S. interests in Latin America.
"*" indicates required fields
