The case of Abdi Daisane, a Minneapolis daycare operator with a troubled compliance history, raises serious questions about the integrity of the state’s social services. Announcing his candidacy for Minnesota’s state legislature in District 14A, Daisane seeks public office even though his facility has racked up 82 documented violations. These violations are crucial to a larger, ongoing scandal that has eroded trust in Minnesota’s oversight mechanisms for social programs.
Daisane’s announcement on December 24, 2023, came as the state grapples with revelations of extensive fraud involving childcare and welfare services. His facility, Blooming Kids Child Center, has been cited repeatedly by the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) for issues such as broken equipment, unqualified staff, and incomplete health records. These concerns point to neglect and underscore systemic failures in oversight that have plagued Minnesota’s child welfare framework.
Edging into the political arena amidst such scrutiny, Daisane’s candidacy has drawn swift reactions on social media. A particularly vocal response highlighted the number of violations linked to his facility, reflecting disbelief and discontent among critics. The overarching sentiment suggests a troubling disconnect between the management of public funds and accountability for those in charge—an issue that resonates deeply in light of the broader fraud scandal affecting state-funded programs.
The current situation represents a significant controversy involving the misuse of federal funds. A federal investigation has revealed rampant abuse across various early-childhood education and food assistance programs. Alarmingly, a staggering half of the $18 billion expended since 2018 is thought to have been fraudulently obtained. While neither Daisane nor his facility has been directly indicted in these federal investigations, the implications of such a scandal complicate his pursuit of office.
FBI Director Kash Patel has characterized this unfolding fraud as “just the tip of a very large iceberg.” Alongside investigations from multiple agencies, there is growing concern about the state’s capabilities to safeguard taxpayer dollars, especially in light of further allegations against local Somali organizations. Many fear that the community at large may unfairly bear the brunt of scrutiny due to the high percentage of Somali-run programs implicated in the scandal.
Daisane’s defense revolves around the need for accessible childcare in Greater Minnesota and purported staffing challenges. He has voiced concerns about recruitment as a hurdle for compliance in his operation. Yet, the frequency of the violations raises questions about the seriousness of these claims. Records indicate that the problems at his facility are not isolated incidents but rather a pattern of neglect that officials have failed to address adequately.
With the investigation spotlighting the Feeding Our Future scheme—intended to distribute meal funds during the pandemic but allegedly misused for profit—the political ramifications are significant. Reports emerged of centers raking in considerable federal assistance while failing to provide adequate services. Daisane’s center is not alone; multiple facilities are now facing scrutiny and potential revocation of licenses, causing turmoil for the families who depend on these services.
The handling of the feeding program indicates deeper issues within Minnesota’s welfare administration, which has been criticized for lacking robust oversight mechanisms. A report from the Office of the Legislative Auditor highlighted “systemic failures in oversight and accountability.” This raises major questions about the willingness of officials to act when faced with evidence of wrongdoing. Auditors cited fears of lawsuits and allegations of racial discrimination that have hindered decisive enforcement actions.
Independent journalist Nick Shirley’s investigative work has further ignited public outrage, illustrating empty daycare facilities that received ample state funding. His videos revealed the stark reality that money was sent to facilities that were ostensibly non-operational. These mismatches between funding and service delivery highlight a culture of negligence that has persisted despite glaring red flags.
The political wave of discontent extends to state leaders who have faced criticism for failing to enforce compliance decisively. Accusations directed at Gov. Tim Walz’s administration illustrate a growing frustration among constituents, and lawmakers have voiced their disappointment publicly. Republican Rep. Kristin Robbins encapsulated the collective frustration: “They can’t say they didn’t know… We gave them a list, and nothing has happened.” This sentiment underscores a desire for accountability amidst alarming revelations.
The repercussions for Minnesota’s Somali-American community are multifaceted. While many operate lawfully, the disproportionate number of indictments among Somali-run entities has ignited political and social tensions. Questions about eligibility and accountability for taxpayer-funded initiatives are more critical than ever. The fate of childcare services hangs in the balance as funding freezes could lead to closures, impacting the lives of over 23,000 children and their families reliant on the state’s assistance program.
Daisane’s intent to run for office, despite his facility’s 82 violations and the shadow of scandal looming over him, embodies a broader challenge in Minnesota politics: addressing the failures of welfare programs without stigmatizing entire communities. As complexities unfold heading into the 2026 elections, lingering questions focus on governance, accountability, and the need to restore integrity to the systems designed to support those most vulnerable.
This unfolding narrative serves as a stark reminder of the importance of vigilant oversight and accountability. Voters and stakeholders in Minnesota must grapple with the implications of a system that has, historically, proven vulnerable to exploitation. Daisane’s campaign will undoubtedly be marked by his connections to a scandal that raises fundamental questions about the efficacy of the very systems he seeks to influence.
"*" indicates required fields
