The recent developments in Venezuela signal a dramatic shift in the balance of power in the region, with significant implications for both the U.S. and its foreign policy. President Donald Trump made a stern announcement regarding Delcy Rodríguez, who has stepped in as acting leader after Nicolás Maduro’s capture by U.S. forces. Trump’s warning— that Rodríguez could face a “very big price,” potentially greater than what Maduro experienced— reflects a hard stance and positions the U.S. as a key player in Venezuela’s political landscape. This direct intervention highlights not just the removal of a dictator, but a message to any leader that resists the push for democratic order.
The operation that led to Maduro’s capture on May 11, 2025, reportedly involved a high-stakes military maneuver that showcased U.S. military capabilities and a willingness to act decisively. Trump stated, “We are reasserting American power in our own hemisphere,” signaling a departure from previous strategies that might have leaned towards diplomacy over force. With respect to international norms, some are raising concerns about the implications of such unilateral action, questioning the legality of bypassing Congress in a military operation. This has drawn comparisons to past interventions, including the 1989 Panama operation, illustrating the contentious nature of U.S. military engagement in foreign affairs.
Rodríguez’s position is precarious. Lacking popular legitimacy and facing distrust from both the Venezuelan opposition and U.S. officials, she might struggle to maintain authority. Analysts suggest that her role is more akin to that of a caretaker than a leader with a clear mandate. Trump’s remarks, stating that she “is not going to be another Maduro” and that the U.S. will not allow her to undermine the newfound hope for Venezuelans, suggest pressure for a swift transition to a stable government.
The support for U.S. action among many Venezuelans emerges from a chronic humanitarian crisis, with food shortages, poverty, and social unrest dominating the landscape under Maduro’s regime. Many view the end of Maduro’s reign as a potential turning point for recovery. However, the risks inherent in the current situation are palpable. The Venezuelan military is fractured, with elements still loyal to the old regime potentially destabilizing efforts for restoration.
Trump and his administration are venturing into uncharted waters, taking control of airports and initiating necessary services while claiming not to occupy the nation. The emphasis on facilitating a democratic transition may appeal to the American public, particularly to those alarmed by Maduro’s past actions. The operation stands not only as a response to Venezuela’s crisis but as a clear message to other nations whose interests conflict with U.S. policies, emphasizing a commitment to national security and democratic values.
As Delcy Rodríguez grapples with her role under American scrutiny, her forthcoming actions will dictate both her fate and that of Venezuela’s vulnerable population. The success of this intervention will depend on how effectively the U.S. can support the country in rebuilding and establishing a government founded on democratic principles. For countless Venezuelans, hope rests on the possibility that this tumultuous chapter may conclude, ushering in a season of stability and reform—provided that both U.S. leadership and local cooperation can pave the way forward.
"*" indicates required fields
