The recent accusations against Jeremiah Ellison, a Minneapolis city council member and son of Attorney General Keith Ellison, have sparked renewed discussions about accountability among public officials. Reports suggest he is “accepting a full-time fellowship at Harvard University while continuing to collect his six-figure taxpayer salary.” This revelation puts a spotlight on a troubling trend in Minnesota’s political landscape, one that reflects broader concerns about the integrity of elected representatives.
Jeremiah Ellison is currently splitting his time between Minneapolis and Cambridge, Massachusetts. This arrangement raises significant questions. According to The Minnesota Star Tribune, he has already stepped back from both the Business, Housing, and Zoning Committee and the Public Health and Safety Committee—key areas of governance that require full engagement from council members. Not surprisingly, fellow council member LaTrisha Vetaw called the situation “unacceptable.” She expressed concern that constituents in North Minneapolis will have “zero” representation in critical city matters during these final months of Ellison’s term.
It is important to note that city council members in Minneapolis earn nearly $110,000 a year. Many might wonder whether it’s appropriate for a member receiving taxpayer funds to also take on a position out of state. Ellison defends his ability to attend important council meetings virtually, but Minneapolis rules prohibit remote voting, which casts doubt on the effectiveness of his participation during pivotal budget discussions.
Moreover, Council President Elliott Payne acknowledged that the arrangement was largely established on the advice of the city clerk. The full council plans to revisit the situation in the coming weeks, indicating that dissatisfaction resides not only with constituents but among fellow council members. Council member Jamal Osman has even called for Ellison’s position to be filled during this transitional period. Such a move shows the mounting frustration regarding the level of representation constituents can expect—and deserve.
Ellison’s response, claiming he “will be present for most full city council meetings” and asserting that “nothing remarkable is actually happening,” seems dismissive. This attitude may further alienate those who feel their voices are not being heard in city government. The integrity of local governance is crucial for maintaining public trust, and actions like Ellison’s can only serve to erode that trust.
Adding another layer to this complicated narrative is the political background of Ellison’s father. Keith Ellison’s previous affiliations, including support for groups like Antifa and CAIR—an organization with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood—provide a context that critics might leverage to question the family’s influence and priorities in Minnesota’s political scene. Jeremiah Ellison’s decision not to run for reelection could be seen as an acknowledgment of the storm clouds brewing over his tenure as a council member.
Ultimately, these developments in Minneapolis should serve as a harbinger for greater scrutiny of public officials who may not fully commit to their responsibilities. As the full council prepares to address Ellison’s situation, all eyes will be on whether accountability will prevail. A demand for transparency and proper representation in local government remains paramount as constituents look for genuine leadership in their communities.
"*" indicates required fields
