Delcy Eloína Rodríguez Gómez’s aspirations for leadership in Venezuela raise serious concerns. Her current position as Vice President is closely tied to the controversial regime of Nicolás Maduro, who was recently captured. While some may speculate about her potential role in rebuilding the country, her past actions and associations make it clear that Rodríguez is not a suitable candidate for any leadership position.
A pivotal moment occurred early in 2025 when Richard Grenell, the special envoy for President Trump, met with Maduro, resulting in the release of six American detainees. This took place shortly after President Trump refused to recognize Maduro’s presidency, following the disputed election in July 2024. Rodríguez remained a loyal supporter of Maduro during this tumultuous time, advocating for his release even after his capture. In a statement, she expressed outrage over the events, labeling Maduro’s arrest an “atrocity that violates international law.” This loyalty underscores her commitment to maintaining the status quo of a regime that has caused immense suffering for the Venezuelan people.
The New York Post recently highlighted Rodríguez’s frustration at the loss of her leader, reflecting her deep ties to a regime that has presided over corruption and human rights abuses. The assertion that she has played a crucial role in sustaining Maduro’s regime cannot be ignored. Key responsibilities attributed to Rodríguez involve overseeing financial operations, including cryptocurrency laundering and other illicit streams that have kept the government afloat. Her expertise in managing financial lifelines through illegal means raises alarms about her suitability as a national leader.
Rodríguez’s connections extend beyond Venezuelan borders. She allegedly operated within a web of transnational organized crime, reportedly coordinating with criminal enterprises that align with authoritarian regimes in Iran, Russia, Cuba, and China. This involvement casts further doubt on her ability to lead with integrity, as her actions contributed to the undermining of democratic structures and international norms.
Perhaps most alarming are the reports linking Rodríguez to terrorist organizations such as Hamas and Hezbollah. The idea that her administration could facilitate their operations, including providing passports and financial resources, paints a grim picture of what a successor regime might entail. Such actions threaten not only Venezuelan citizens but also regional stability and international security.
President Trump clearly articulated his stance during a recent press conference, rebuffing any suggestions that Rodríguez would be an effective leader in the aftermath of Maduro’s capture. He noted the necessity to approach the situation with caution, warning against any endorsement of her capabilities. This caution is critical, especially given her extensive involvement in a regime that qualifies as a nexus of corruption and complicity in criminal activities.
The narrative surrounding Delcy Rodríguez goes beyond mere political ambition; it is steeped in a legacy of complicity with a dictatorship that has oppressed its citizens while aligning with hostile foreign elements. Her continued influence and calls for a united front against the U.S. only deepen suspicions regarding her intentions. Those advocating for her position would do well to reconsider the implications of her previous actions and the potential risks associated with her leadership.
In conclusion, allowing Delcy Rodríguez to ascend to any significant leadership role in Venezuela stands against the interests of peace, democracy, and justice. Her past affiliations and roles tied to organized crime and undemocratic operations should serve as a warning. The possibility of her continuing influence in a post-Maduro landscape must be firmly opposed.
"*" indicates required fields
