Jon Stewart’s recent confrontation with Senator Mark Kelly on “The Daily Show” laid bare the contradictions within the Democratic Party regarding military action and the treatment of American citizens. The discussion arose from a controversial video in which Kelly and five fellow Democratic lawmakers, all veterans or former intelligence officers, urged active-duty service members to refuse “illegal orders.” The Pentagon and the Trump administration swiftly labeled this message as “seditious.” Stewart didn’t pull any punches as he challenged Kelly on the legality of current military operations.
During the interview, Kelly attempted to draw a clear line, claiming, “If a reasonable person would think that this thing that they are asking me to do is illegal, you have an obligation.” When pressed further by Stewart about the legality of recent military strikes, Kelly’s confidence faltered. He admitted that the government’s legal justifications were complex—spanning 40 pages—and noted that their legality was “questionable at best.” He effectively acknowledged that the reasons for these actions appeared to shift like the wind, incorporating varying rationales like drug trafficking and regime change.
In a moment of sharp clarity, Stewart reminded both Kelly and the audience of a significant chapter in recent history. He highlighted the Obama administration’s drone strikes that resulted in the deaths of American citizens, particularly Anwar al-Awlaki and his son, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki. This was particularly poignant as it underscored how these incidents have seemingly slipped from the Democrats’ focus. Anwar al-Awlaki was a cleric with ties to al-Qaeda, targeted and killed without trial in 2011 under President Obama’s orders—the first time an American citizen had been deliberately executed by the government without due process since the Civil War.
Just two weeks later, a drone strike claimed the life of 16-year-old Abdulrahman, also an American citizen. The government labeled his death as a “mistake,” a justification that rings hollow when examined closely. As Stewart pointed out, this begs the question: where was the outcry or the call for defiance when the Obama administration set this dangerous precedent? Instead of rallying against these lethal policies, the mainstream Democratic establishment remained largely silent.
The conversation took on deeper implications as Stewart pressed renewed questions of military ethics and legality surrounding modern warfare. While Kelly now urges service members to scrutinize orders from the Trump administration, his approach appears selective, failing to address his own party’s past wrongs. Stewart struck a nerve, pointing out the hypocrisy that seems to pervade the Democrat narrative today.
One user on social media summed this sentiment succinctly: “When Obama vaporizes an American citizen without due process, they fabricate forty pages of bureaucratic cover to justify the execution. When Trump exercises lawful command, they incite mutiny.” This highlights a growing frustration with the inconsistency in the handling of military authority and civil rights by the party.
Stewart’s interview reveals more than just a clash between a comedian and a senator; it exposes a troubling trend in American politics. As debates about military ethics and legality intensify, the need for a consistent application of principles across administrations is paramount, a need that both sides must confront without glossing over their own moral failings.
"*" indicates required fields
