For 26 years, the Venezuelan people have endured the harsh realities of socialism. This history serves as a backdrop to current events as President Trump actively seeks to address this ongoing crisis. His leadership signals a renewed commitment to altering the course of Venezuela’s trajectory, departing from a period of neglect and inaction.
The essence of Trump’s approach lies in what many refer to as a modern iteration of the Monroe Doctrine. Under this doctrine, the United States takes measures to counter foreign adversaries, creating a framework for regional security and prosperity. Trump’s involvement in Venezuelan affairs is not only bold but also firmly rooted in legal precedents allowing U.S. intervention in the Western Hemisphere.
Historically, the United States has engaged in military action in the Caribbean and Latin America under circumstances where national interests and the need for stability were threatened. Notable examples include the U.S. invasion of Grenada in 1983 aimed at thwarting a communist takeover and the action against Manuel Noriega in Panama in 1989, which sought to address drug trafficking and restore order. These precedents provide a robust foundation for Trump’s actions, asserting his authority as commander-in-chief as laid out in Article II of the Constitution.
Each of these interventions was grounded in justifiable reasons: ensuring the safety of U.S. citizens, combating threats to regional stability, and countering narcotics-related issues. Trump’s approach similarly aligns with these historical actions. His tactics invoke frameworks like the Authorization for Use of Military Force, underscoring the legal basis of military and foreign policy decisions.
Trump’s interventions emerge from the acknowledgment that when a neighboring regime jeopardizes regional safety—through mechanisms like mass migration or drug trafficking—the U.S. is within its rights to respond decisively. Such considerations echo the principles of just war theory, which argues that military action is warrantable under criteria of just cause, right intention, and proportionality.
In contrast to past administrations that prioritized the promotion of social initiatives that often alienated allies, Trump appears committed to a policy focused on direct benefits for American interests. He utilizes tools such as the Alien Enemies Act and the War Powers Resolution to tackle threats presented by the current Venezuelan regime, which has failed its citizens and sought to export its chaos abroad.
Crucially, Trump’s actions have revitalized the U.S. stance toward Venezuela’s oil resources. Once a major producer largely due to American investment, Venezuela’s oil infrastructure had suffered greatly under the stranglehold of tyranny. With Trump’s emphasis on reclaiming these resources, he is ensuring that profits bolster U.S. energy independence while denying funding to adversaries that threaten national interests.
This renewed focus on U.S. oil policies dovetails with America’s historical connection to Venezuela’s energy sector, marking a pointed move to reassert American influence in a region once characterized by robust partnerships and development initiatives. It casts aside the failures of past policies that allowed infrastructure to decay under socialist rule.
Trump’s plan, dubbed “Operation Absolute Resolve,” signifies a formidable execution of a revitalized Monroe Doctrine—now referred to as the “Donroe Doctrine.” This strategy aims to confront the current threats posed by not only Venezuela but also by powers like China and Russia. These nations have established significant influence in the region through predatory practices and military support for authoritarian regimes.
Through Trump’s intervention, a concerted effort to challenge these influences and ensure U.S. primacy in Latin America takes shape. The state of Venezuela exemplifies what could happen when authoritarianism meets American resolve: uncertainty for hostile forces operating in the region and a strategic pathway for stabilization.
Continuing the oil embargo on Venezuela and positioning U.S. management to oversee its transition to a citizen-focused governance will provide the economic leverage necessary for recovery. This form of stewardship aims to rebuild the country while rooting out corruption—setting a stark contrast to the costly nation-building mistakes witnessed in previous decades.
Trump’s unwavering commitment to liberating Venezuela signals a resurgence of American leadership and assertiveness on the world stage. It sends a potent message to neighboring regimes in Cuba and Nicaragua: the era of complacency has ended. Under the “Donroe Doctrine,” the United States is poised to take a firm stand against the encroaching ideology of socialism.
"*" indicates required fields
