The recent arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces marks a striking moment in international relations. It highlights China’s limited capacity to project power beyond its borders. This operation was not just a significant military action; it revealed fundamental weaknesses in China’s global influence.
China reacted sharply to the U.S. operation, calling it a “serious violation of international law.” Beijing has historically positioned itself as a defender of a “rules-based international order,” a claim now put to the test. Chinese President Xi Jinping characterized the U.S. action as “unilateral bullying,” but the harsh rhetoric has not translated into meaningful action. China quickly called for a United Nations Security Council meeting, but this diplomatic maneuver achieved little of real consequence.
The economic relationship between China and Venezuela complicates the response. Despite strong ties—China is Venezuela’s second-largest trading partner—Beijing finds itself unable to take effective action without incurring significant risks to its own economy. China’s reliance on exports to the U.S. and the potential for economic backlash prevent meaningful retaliation. Any move to cut ties would severely damage China’s financial interests, especially given the Trump administration’s ongoing push to decouple from Chinese markets.
Moreover, the narrative around China being a substantial lender to the U.S. is often misleading. Most reports overlook the nuanced reality of China holding U.S. debt instruments. These bonds carry future maturity dates, meaning immediate sales would not harm the U.S. economy substantially and would likely diminish China’s financial standing as well.
From a military perspective, China’s ability to project force is even more limited. Despite boasting the world’s third-largest military, China has historically struggled to operate far from its shores. With just two military bases outside of its territory compared to the United States’ approximately 800, China’s power remains largely regional. Even when it made moves to increase its presence in Latin America—such as sending a hospital ship and intelligence vessel as recently as 2025—those actions failed to translate into a military posture capable of reacting effectively against U.S. operations, as evidenced by the swift capture of Maduro.
The advanced Chinese military hardware, including air defense systems that Venezuela employs, proved ineffective when faced with sophisticated U.S. tactics and electronic warfare. This operation demonstrated that when challenged by a capable adversary, Chinese technology has significant shortcomings that may undermine its effectiveness.
The stakes of this operation are high, particularly given the $50 billion investment China has made in Venezuela. This investment comprises a significant portion of its lending to Latin America. Despite this investment and arms sales totaling over $615 million in the past decade, China’s inability or unwillingness to act militarily reveals a stark reality: it can only offer economic support but lacks the backbone to defend its interests when the chips are down.
The timing of Maduro’s capture, shortly after his meeting with Chinese officials, underscores the dynamic at play. It sends a clear signal about the U.S. willingness to operate unimpeded in its own hemisphere, emphasizing that China’s strategic claims may not be as formidable as they appear. In practical terms, this paints a concerning picture for China’s allies, suggesting that if Beijing hesitates to back a primary partner like Venezuela militarily, it is unlikely to risk engagement for less critical allies.
This incident raises significant questions about China’s future commitments. Observers ponder whether China would engage militarily to defend Taiwan, and the lack of a strong response to Maduro’s capture indicates that China may be unwilling to commit forces in defense of allies like Russia or Iran as well. The operation stands as an unsettling reminder of the limitations of China’s influence, reinforcing the view that it remains, at least for now, a paper tiger—vocal on the global stage but lacking the military capacity to enforce its will.
As the drama continues to unfold, the U.S. operation transcends Maduro’s individual fate; it sends a clear message throughout the Americas. The world is watching, and the implications of this operation resonate far beyond Venezuela, signaling that the balance of power in the region favors the United States. Through this lens, the operation underlines the notion that claims of power require more than words; they must be backed by credible action, a challenge China appears unable to meet when faced with the might of the United States.
"*" indicates required fields
