Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner is facing backlash for his recent remarks regarding U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). His assertion that “dismantling ICE” is a “moderate” stance has sparked ridicule and concern, especially in light of a tragic incident in Minneapolis. There, federal immigration agents shot and killed a woman, Renee Nicole Good, who allegedly posed a threat during their operations.
Platner took to social media to express his views, claiming that sending “armed, under-trained amateurs” into communities would lead to inevitable confrontations like the one that ended Good’s life. His rhetoric suggests a complete rejection of ICE, insisting, “ICE must be dismantled.” He characterized his position as moderate, yet many are questioning whether it truly aligns with the reality of public sentiment regarding law enforcement and safety.
The reaction to the shooting has been intense. Minneapolis City Council members condemned the operation, labeling it an “attack,” and have called for ICE to exit their city. Mayor Jacob Frey echoed this sentiment with vulgar rhetoric directed at federal agents, illustrating the extent of anger felt by some local officials. This reflects a growing divide over how immigration enforcement is perceived in urban areas.
Critics have not held back in their responses to Platner. The Media Research Center’s Tim Graham remarked, “This guy doesn’t know moderate,” while others pointed to his alleged Nazi tattoo, suggesting his call for violence against ICE contradicts his claims of moderation. The presence of such a tattoo raises questions about his political identity and the credibility of his statements.
Many conservative voices have used this moment to highlight what they see as a broader trend of Democrats advocating for leniency toward illegal immigration, likening efforts to “dismantle ICE” as part of a larger push reminiscent of calls to defund police departments. Alabama Senate candidate Morgan Murphy encapsulated this sentiment, insisting, “Absolutely not: stand with ICE. Stand with law enforcement.”
Platner’s history is also raising eyebrows. He previously referred to himself as a “communist” in Reddit posts, later trying to dismiss those comments as mere “internet sh–posting.” Such inconsistencies in messaging and identity may make voters wary.
The protests sparked by the shooting saw demonstrators demanding the removal of ICE, which could be seen as a reflection of a fraction of the population that supports dismantling immigration enforcement. Tuesday’s chaos outside a Minneapolis courthouse underscored this anger, with crowds visibly expressing their frustrations against federal agency operations.
As Platner vies for the Democratic nomination to challenge a sitting Republican senator in 2026, he may need to reassess his framing of such a contentious issue. The combination of his incendiary remarks, coupled with past controversies, puts him in a precarious position as he seeks to garner support in a state with a more moderate electorate.
Graham Platner’s approach has ignited a debate that may resonate through the 2026 Senate race. Whether he can hold onto his “moderate” position as he navigates the backlash remains to be seen. The challenges posed by both the public reaction to his statements and his controversial personal history will undoubtedly play a significant role in shaping his campaign’s trajectory.
"*" indicates required fields
