A nonprofit organization that is comprised of researchers that have, God bless their precious souls, gone through the now infamous Hunter Biden laptop and all of it’s sleazy contents, sent out a letter to the judge who is currently overseeing the troubled younger son of the president’s tax fraud case, asking her to reject the plea deal that has been offered up by prosecutors. Personally, I feel that would be the right decision to make. A regular citizen lacking the powerful political connections Hunter enjoys, what with his dad being president and all, would be tossed in the clink for these same violations without so much as a second glance. It’s only fair the Biden family be treated the same.
Here’s more information from the folks at the Daily Wire:
Marco Polo, which put emails from the laptop online and wrote a 630-page report summarizing its contents, said that judges are not obligated to accept plea deals even if prosecutors and the defendant agree on them, and that “not only will the plea deal in front of you, if accepted, make a mockery of the phrase ‘slap on the wrist,’ but it will also send a sobering message to citizens which demonstrates that nepotism and proximity to political power determines outcomes in our criminal justice system.”
It went on to say, “there is evidence for, at the very least, 459 violations of state and federal laws and regulations on the device. The breakdown is as follows: 140 business-related crimes, 191 sex-related crimes, and, lastly, 128 drug-related crimes. These instances of criminal wrongdoing are supported by primary source evidence: emails, photos, videos, text messages, audio files, et al. The plea deal for your consideration is so meager that the phrase ‘limited hangout’ does not describe the situation.”
It said a “limited hangout” is a public relations technique in which someone who wants to cover up something major admits to a very small portion in order to claim that the issue has been put to rest. Joining Marco Polo in the letter was Rudy Giuliani, the former Donald Trump attorney who played a role in disseminating the laptop after the FBI appeared to sit on it.
“By virtue of having been the United States Attorney (‘USA’) for the Southern District of New York, Mr. Giuliani is uniquely capable of spotting a ‘sweetheart’ deal reserved for those such as Biden, whose father is the president. Without Biden’s familial connections, there is no way any USA or AUSA would have proposed two misdemeanors and essentially a non-prosecution on the felony gun charge,” the letter explained.
The attorney representing Giuliani, Robert Costello, a former deputy who served in the New York prosecutor’s office, also put his signature on the letter addressed to Judge Maryellen Noreika of the District of Delaware federal court.
The letter also went on to explain that disclosures that have come from whistleblowers, as well as from congressional oversight, have given massive amounts of data and information that suggest the plea deal, which has been limited in its application to misdemeanor tax charges, would make it possible for a felony gun charge to disappear thanks to a diversion program, only carrying a sentence of probation, suggesting this deal was the result of prosecutorial misconduct.
“It said that then-Assistant US Attorney Lesley Wolf prevented investigators from getting more evidence by tipping the Bidens off that a raid on a storage unit was imminement,” the report continued.
“This egregious leak from Wolf-and her Department of Justice colleague and lawyer, Mark Daly-infuriated the IRS investigators (i.e. two of the whistleblowers) and likely violated Pennsylvania Bar rules (where Wolf is barred) in addition to federal statutes. Furthermore, Wolf apparently concealed evidence from the investigators, demanded that investigators avoid inquiring about ‘the big guy,’ a moniker for the U.S. president, Joe Biden, and was improperly concerned about the ‘optics’ regarding a search warrant of the U.S. President’s guest house. Suffice it is to say that ‘optics’ should not dictate investigative steps,'” the letter said.
The letter revealed that congressional testimony given by whistleblowers working for the IRS revealed Hunter Biden’s attorney, Chris Clark — the guy who was recently spotted smoking from a bong — told the prosecution that their “careers would be ruined if they brought various charges against Hunter.”
Further, “the District of Delaware has never — going back to 1995 — charged 26 USC §7203 as a standalone misdemeanor, as is the case with Biden. This proposed plea deal is, quite literally, unprecedented; we hope you will recognize that it is unprecedented because it is unjust,” the letter said.
“Lastly, the Chairman of the Oversight and Accountability Committee in the U.S. House of Representatives has announced that Biden’s former business partner, Devon Archer, will be testifying before his Committee early next week. It is imperative that this Court be apprised of that testimony to consider whether to accept this plea offer. At the very least, Your Honor’s consideration of this proposed plea should not be made until you are aware of all the salient facts likely to be revealed,” it said.
The American people want to see the Biden family held to the same standard they are held to when it comes to the law. If they would be thrown in prison for committing the same crimes that Hunter and Joe allegedly participated in, why should these two avoid the same punishment? What makes them special? The answer, of course, is nothing.
All are supposed to be equal under the law.
"*" indicates required fields
