Vice President Kamala Harris doesn’t have cognitive decline or dementia, though a strong and obvious case has been made for those very issues in our president. No, as it turns out, her brain just doesn’t have the capacity for the storing of critical, important information and the application of logical reasoning. In fact, it seems stuffing the “on board computer” in her grey matter with pre-programmed progressive talking points she can spit out as answers to questions left-wing propagandists in the media clap like seals over has reached its capacity.
This is evidenced by the fact that you can practically see Harris’ brain short circuit and smoke roll out of her ears during a recent interview she had with leftist lapdog Stephanie Ruhle of MSNBC. It’s the kind of conversation that’s more fluffy than little white clouds, marshmallow cream, and sweet little puppies. And yet, when asked a simple question, rather than nail the answer, she completely flubbed it by regurgitating one of those talking points.
She could have literally said anything else at that moment and it would have been better than the answer she actually gave. Harris is a complete and total disaster just waiting to happen. This automaton should not be allowed in the Oval Office.
via Western Journal:
In effect, Ruhle asked how, as president, Harris would pay for expanded child tax credits and housing subsidies. Never mind that one does not “pay” for tax credits. The framing of the question is what mattered. “If you can’t raise corporate taxes, or if GOP takes control of the Senate, where do you get the money to do that? Do you still go forward with those plans and borrow?” Ruhle asked in a clip posted to the social media platform X.
Now, keep in mind that Ruhle said “if you can’t raise corporate taxes.” Harris responded as if the talking-point programming overrode manual control. “Well,” the vice president said before briefly pausing, “but we’re gonna have to raise corporate taxes.”
Remember, Harris now works for those corporations. She and her fellow Democrats, along with a smaller but still shameful percentage of Republicans in Washington, D.C., serve the establishment, which stands for open borders, needless proxy wars, censorship, domestic surveillance, weaponization of government, medical mandates, gun confiscation, woke indoctrination and every other authoritarian tool that reduces citizens to slaves.
Corporate leaders, as the WJ article points out, know exactly what to expect from Harris. Leadership within these companies are well aware that she needs to say they will raise corporate taxes because there’s not much left in the arsenal for Democrats to use in order to get people on their side come November.
Harris continued, “And we’re gonna have to raise….We’re gonna have to make sure that the biggest corporations and billionaires pay their fair share. That’s just it. It’s about paying their fair share.”
NEW: Kamala Harris gets stumped during her first solo sit-down interview since becoming the Democratic nominee.
Stephanie Ruhle: "If you can't raise corporate taxes or if GOP takes control of the Senate, where do you get the money to do that?"
Harris: "Well, but we're gonna… pic.twitter.com/lp951n3etd
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 25, 2024
How many times have we all heard that exact same “fair share” business over the years? Basically every election cycle of the last century.
“Never mind that she does not mean it for all the reasons aforementioned. Even if she did mean it, the notion of paying one’s ‘fair share’ in taxes, without establishing the purpose of those taxes or the need for them, is a terrible idea, for it presupposes that taxation has a punitive function — an idea that appeals only to simpletons with minds addled by envy,” the article read.
Another question to ask is what does “fair share” mean? Who determines what is fair? Who gives that person the authority to determine that? Oh. Right. The “elite” in charge. And I bet the lion’s share of the money lands in the pockets of those same individuals.
Anyway, the real point here is that Harris lacks the ability to string words together in groups we call sentences in such a way as to communicate something to another human being. Many of her public speeches, especially those without a script, turn into word salads.
Michael Schwarz concluded the article by saying, “Thus, when Ruhle asked what Harris would do if she could not raise corporate taxes, and Harris responded that she would have to raise corporate taxes, we know that the vice president said that, not because she meant it, but because her talking-point programming kicked in and told her to shift immediately into ‘fair share’ gobbledygook.”
"*" indicates required fields
