One of the most unexpected outcomes of Vice President Kamala Harris losing big time to President-elect Donald Trump in this year’s election is just how brutal other Democrats have been in dismantling her campaign and performing an autopsy on it to see why she did so poorly against her competition. After all, the propagandists in the mainstream media believed that her victory was a done deal before Election Day. Democrats were absolutely stunned by not only her loss, but how bad the beating was for the left across the board.
Alex Cooper, host of the female-centered sex-talk podcast known as “Call Her Daddy,” threw some serious shade toward Harris and her presidential campaign, though it didn’t exactly seem like it was done on purpose. Cooper insisted that despite the rumors going around, there’s no possible way that Harris and her presidential campaign dropped $100,000 on the set for their interview — which was constructed from cardboard — because, in the host’s own words, it just “wasn’t that nice.”
“Like, no, that was not six figures,” Cooper stated in a video clip posted on X. The comments were made while Cooper was doing an interview with Andrew Ross Sorkin from the left-wing rag, The New York Times, according to The Western Journal. During the discussion, Sorkin asked Cooper about “the little bit of controversy” that came out of her interview with the vice president.
“Apparently, you could tell me, they spent — the Harris campaign — spent like a hundred thousand dollars — you know about this? — to build the studio to make it look like it was the studio that you use in L.A.,” Sorkin went on to say about the makeshift studio set up in a Washington, D.C.-area house. Cooper said that it wasn’t true.
“My studio that is gorgeous in Los Angeles doesn’t even cost six figures, so I don’t know how cardboard walls could cost six figures,” she remarked. If the set for their interview didn’t cost six figures, then how much did it actually cost to make it and what was done with the rest of the cash? Lot of money unaccounted for, wouldn’t you say?
Even the Call Her Daddy host acknowledges that the fake set shouldn't have cost Kamala Harris' campaign 100k:
Alex Cooper: "It was like Random House. But apparently, you can tell me they spent nine. The Harris campaign spent, like, $100,000.
My studio that is gorgeous in Los… pic.twitter.com/Jbr7Rjhzjl— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) December 5, 2024
Of course, the podcast host has no idea what the Harris campaign spent on cardboard walls. She simply speculated that the walls she saw could not possibly have cost six figures. Never mind that a D.C.-area house made up to look like Cooper’s California studio perfectly encapsulates the vice president’s phoniness. The issue here involves the Harris campaign’s spendthrift ways.
For instance, in a recent clip posted to X, longtime sports journalist Stephen A. Smith mocked Harris campaign operatives for paying $500,000 to MSNBC commentator and notorious race-baiter Al Sharpton ahead of an October interview, as well as $2.5 million to media mogul Oprah Winfrey, who hosted a town hall event for the vice president.
WOW! I don’t know how I missed this, but this is the best RANT I have heard in a while!!
🔥🔥🔥
Stephen A. Smith DESTROYS the Democrats:
“If you’re the Democratic Party, here’s my advice to you: shut up, wait for him to get pushed into office or to accept inauguration on… pic.twitter.com/L9SrswNKZ9
— I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) December 8, 2024
Another popular Democratic operative, James Carville, called for the campaign to be audited to find out where all of the money went.
“James Carville is sounding the alarm that she may have misused the funds.”
$2.5 billion. pic.twitter.com/yHYdCnAKrj
— Douglas Ritz (@douglasritz) November 30, 2024
“Carville and others like him, however, will have to contend with woke Democrats who believe that merit does not matter. After all, by their reckoning, anyone who notices that the Harris campaign misspent funds probably qualifies as racist and/or sexist. Meanwhile, Trump voters may rest easy knowing that the people who reportedly spent $2.5 million on Winfrey, $500,000 on Sharpton and $100,000 on cardboard will have no power over the American economy,” the report concluded.
"*" indicates required fields