Chicago Mayor Issues LGBTQ ‘Call to Arms’, Over ROE Ruling

As progressives started racking up victories at the Supreme Court in the 1960s, the Baby Boomer to current generations of liberals has anticipated a day when the United States would become an open society, in a make-believe world, Utopia.

Radical Justices, including Chief Justice Roberts, have chosen to find protections in our nation’s founding documents, even though they don’t exist as written.

Here are a few examples:

Seven male SCOTUS Justices ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides a fundamental “right to privacy” that protects a pregnant woman’s liberty to choose whether to have an abortion.

Justice Roberts’ decided that homosexuals should also be able to marry so he arbitrarily created a right for “gays’ to marry, also using the 14th amendment.

These were both contested rulings as the 14th Amendment was written to protect former slaves from discrimination.

“The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was adopted in 1868. It granted citizenship and equal civil and legal rights to African Americans and enslaved people who had been emancipated after the American Civil War.”

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot (D), a married lesbian activist, has issued an LGBTQ “call to arms” in response to the leaked Supreme Court decision signaling the end of Roe v. Wade.

Echoing the fearmongering being put forward by leftists, including President Biden, Lightfoot charged that the Supreme Court will soon be targeting LGBTQ rights if it has its way with ending Roe.

“To my friends in the LGBTQ+ community—the Supreme Court is coming for us next,” she tweeted on Monday. “This moment has to be a call to arms.”

“We will not surrender our rights without a fight—a fight to victory!” she added.

We will not surrender our rights without a fight—a fight to victory!

— Lori Lightfoot (@LoriLightfoot) May 10, 2022

Prior to her “call to arms,” Lightfoot declared she and the women leaders of Chicago will collectively stand for “reproductive freedom.”

Proud to stand side-by-side with fearless women leaders of Chicago. We will fight like hell to protect reproductive freedom for women here and across the country! #JusticeForAllPledge pic.twitter.com/65caG4d4HK

— Lori Lightfoot (@LoriLightfoot) May 9, 2022

The left has been working overtime to spread fear in the wake of the leaked decision.

“When you read Justice Alito’s opinion, what he focuses on is history, and he says we don’t have to protect our access to abortion because historically we haven’t had that access. Boy, that ought to make your gay friends nervous because we don’t have a long history of protecting equal marriage,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said recently on The View.

“We don’t have a long history of protecting interracial marriage. We don’t have a long history of protecting access to contraception. All of those things that we have now counted on instead — that’s the America we are — could potentially, under Justice Alito’s own analysis, go out,” she added.

Protesters have illegally targeted the personal homes of 6 conservative justices hoping to intimidate them into changing their expected votes.

“That’s not a valid form of protest because it’s a violation of the law,” former Attorney General William Barr recently said. “There is time and place for protests, and the federal statute makes it clear if you go to the house of a judge, the residence of a judge to influence the judge in his decisions and demonstrate that that’s a federal crime.”

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who “pickets or parades” with the “intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer” near a U.S. court or “near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer” will be fined, or “imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

By: Eric Thompson, editor of EricThompsonShow.com. Follow me on Twitter and MagaBook